Contact

If you need help using Tor you can contact WikiLeaks for assistance in setting it up using our simple webchat available at: /talk

If you can use Tor, but need to contact WikiLeaks for other reasons use our secured webchat available at http://wlchatc3pjwpli5r.onion

We recommend contacting us over Tor if you can.

Tor

Tor is an encrypted anonymising network that makes it harder to intercept internet communications, or see where communications are coming from or going to.

In order to use the WikiLeaks public submission system as detailed above you can download the Tor Browser Bundle, which is a Firefox-like browser available for Windows, Mac OS X and GNU/Linux and pre-configured to connect using the anonymising system Tor.

Tails

If you are at high risk and you have the capacity to do so, you can also access the submission system through a secure operating system called Tails. Tails is an operating system launched from a USB stick or a DVD that aim to leaves no traces when the computer is shut down after use and automatically routes your internet traffic through Tor. Tails will require you to have either a USB stick or a DVD at least 4GB big and a laptop or desktop computer.

Tips

Our submission system works hard to preserve your anonymity, but we recommend you also take some of your own precautions. Please review these basic guidelines.

1. Contact us if you have specific problems

If you have a very large submission, or a submission with a complex format, or are a high-risk source, please contact us. In our experience it is always possible to find a custom solution for even the most seemingly difficult situations.

2. What computer to use

If the computer you are uploading from could subsequently be audited in an investigation, consider using a computer that is not easily tied to you. Technical users can also use Tails to help ensure you do not leave any records of your submission on the computer.

3. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

After

1. Do not talk about your submission to others

If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. We are the global experts in source protection – it is a complex field. Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations.

2. Act normal

If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour.

3. Remove traces of your submission

If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.

In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media (USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives) retain data even after a secure erasure. If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media.

If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion.

4. If you face legal action

If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you. The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. You can find more details at https://www.couragefound.org.

WikiLeaks publishes documents of political or historical importance that are censored or otherwise suppressed. We specialise in strategic global publishing and large archives.

The following is the address of our secure site where you can anonymously upload your documents to WikiLeaks editors. You can only access this submissions system through Tor. (See our Tor tab for more information.) We also advise you to read our tips for sources before submitting.

http://ibfckmpsmylhbfovflajicjgldsqpc75k5w454irzwlh7qifgglncbad.onion

If you cannot use Tor, or your submission is very large, or you have specific requirements, WikiLeaks provides several alternative methods. Contact us to discuss how to proceed.


Bermuda Housing Corporation Scandal

From WikiLeaks

Jump to: navigation, search
QC Saul Froomkin, right, Alan Dunch, centre and Royal Gazette editor Bill Zuill, outside the Privy Council, 9 Downing Street, London, where they defended the media against a gagging order of the Bermuda Housing Corporation Police Dossier. Photo courtesy of Simon Dawson

Wikileaks Monday October 29, 2007

TODAY the highest court in the British Empire, the British Privy Council, heard a media suppression order case appealed by the government of Bermuda over sensitive leaked police files which expose government corruption at the highest levels.

Bermuda, a tax haven and one of the world's wealthiest islands, is the financial headquarters of media mogul Rupert Murdoch and many other billionaires.

Since June, the documents have led to a police raid on the Bermuda Broadcasting Corporation, the arrest of the Auditor General and have sparked a diplomatic incident between Bermuda and the United Kingdom.

The premier of Bermuda, Mr. Brown, and the Attorney General, Philip Perinchief, are seeking to have the Privy Council order that the media cannot print information from the leaked police files.

Wikileaks has released a statement from the leaker, known as 'Son of the Soil', together with the leaked document summary that is the subject of the suppression proceedings in the Privy Council.

Back in 2002 the Bermuda police undertook an investigation into allegations of corruption at the Bermuda Housing Corporation (BHC) following the loss of $8,000,000 (eight million dollars). Apparently, in 2004, the acting Director of Public Prosecutions Kulandra Ratneser said some of those investigated escaped prosecution due to Bermuda’s antiquated corruption laws; the parties were not exonerated. Only the conviction of property officer Terence Smith followed. The matter appeared concluded.

In 2006 Bermuda’s Auditor General, Larry Denis, published his report which highlighted the ‘disappearance’ (inability to account for) $800,000,000 (eight hundred million dollars). Mr. Dennis is reported to have said: “One recommendation (in Appendix Two) requires special mention this year. In my 2003, 2004 and 2005 annual reports I expressed concern at the number of frauds and misappropriations that were detected in recent years in Government entities”. The BHC scandal appears to have paled into insignificance; clearly the Bermuda police had to consider proportionality and priorities; the police fraud department manpower comprised single figures – forget BHC’s eight million, there was $792,000,000 of Government ‘leakage’ to find … except it appears that this colossal loss is not being investigated!

Then, in May 2007, the BHC scandal resurfaced and hit Bermuda’s headlines again … new allegations appeared in Bermuda’s press, information gleaned from a ‘secret’ police file naming suspects that included the head of the island’s government, the Premier Ewart Brown. The police dossier was said to run into thousands of pages.

There was an outcry from the serving Government and the police that this file could be in the hands of the press. The AG Philip Perinchief apparently said it was about principles and drew a parallel: "Just think for example that your neighbor accused you of a scandalous crime, the police come to question you and the inner workings of that investigation are then handed over to the press for publication - even though you've done nothing in the eyes of the law. I expect you would be mortified." What Mr Perinchief appears to have misunderstood is that the accusation was made, Ewart Brown’s name came up as a suspect but the police did NOT ‘come to question him’. What likely mortifies people is that the island’s premier would appear to remain a suspect AND has never answered the allegations; he has never been questioned by the police. Why not?

What followed was, and remains, bizarre; the island’s chief of Police, George Jackson was initially reported to have said that the ‘secret’ file was 'MISSING'. Then the file was said to have been ‘STOLEN’. Deputy Commissioner Roseanda Young apparently said that there were special measures in place to secure all documentation. However, these measures appear to have been anything but ‘special’; the file escaped and its disappearance has yet to be accounted for, the file has not been located. It appears all the more odd that Mr Jackson was unable to immediately say that the file was ‘stolen’, he could only explain that the papers were unaccounted for despite ‘special measures’.

Police Commissioner George Jackson and Attorney General Philip Perinchief launched a court action against the media who published information relating to the leak. They were represented by lawyer Delroy Duncan: a person whose name featured in an enquiry undertaken by George Jackson that was described by one former Bermuda senior officer as “an investigation of what undoubtedly remains the largest and most serious crimes of conspiracy, drug trafficking, and money laundering ever conducted in the Bermuda Police Service." An investigation that it would appear has similarities to the BHC enquiry; it was not progressed.

Ewart Brown has not answered the allegations; he has gagged the media. The Government, via Senator David Burch, Minister of Public Safety, has also written to the Governor, Sir John Vereker, asking him to delegate his responsibilities over the Bermuda Police Service.

As the Bermuda Courts have already found in favour of the island’s press (Bermuda Royal Gazette, Mid Ocean News and ZBM radio), on Monday 29th October 2007, the issues will be aired at Bermuda's highest court of appeal, Privy Council, London. Mr. Brown, Attorney General Philip Perinchief and George Jackson will seek to have the Privy Council order that the media cannot print information from the leaked police files.

Who will win? Many appear to have sided with the media. The Bermuda Government clearly has a problem with its ability to control expenditure; the leak of public funds appears to be a haemorrhage. Is this surprising if no one is investigating, apprehending and prosecuting offenders? If there is no deterrent, why would whoever is responsible stop? How else are the public to ascertain what has happened and make an informed decision in the absence of leaks? Bermuda is one of the few western hemisphere countries without Freedom of Information legislation.

More recently, (22nd October 2007) Premier Ewart Brown launched a personal attempt to prevent the press printing details of the BHC police investigation. Mr Brown was apparently represented by Charles Richardson, a lawyer called to the Bar in 2004 just two years after being released, having served seven years of a 15 year term of imprisonment for his part in a nightclub shooting. As for the Auditor General, Mr Denis who raised concerns in his report, he has had his offices searched, been arrested and is currently on bail. He is suspected of being connected with the disappearance of the secret police file, a file he has apparently claimed he was provided by a former commissioner of police, Jonathan Smith. It appears the Bermuda police are willing to quiz the Auditor General over a missing (stolen?) file but not the Premier, Ewart Brown, about the missing (stolen?) $8,000,000.

As for who leaked the police file, all that has been reported is that he / she goes by the name 'Son of the Soil'. As with all of the above further information can be gleaned by undertaking a simple Google search of the names and “+Bermuda”. As for leaked documents in general, it is evident from searching the internet for Bermuda police files that there are many leaked papers on the web, this is not a new problem, so why the concern about the BHC file?

See

Personal tools